एक्रॉस डीएओ स्कैंडल

एक विकेंद्रीकृत स dream का पतन

मुझे पहले ही कई प्रोजेक्ट्स को ‘सच्चा विकेंद्रीकरण’ की प्रतिज्ञा सुनने में समय लगा। एक्रॉस प्रोटोकॉल भी इसमें से ekथा—पारडाइम, बेन कैपिटल क्रिप्टो सहयोग, ‘अगली पीढ़ी’ के क्रॉस-चेन ब्रिज।

परंतु Ogle.eth ne ek bombshell drop kiya—टीम मतदान हेरफेर aur $23 मिलियन private wallets mein transfer karne ke dhan me kharidne kee aabhaas kiya hai।

मुझे हैरानी हुई? Nahi. Mujhe… unsurprised hua.

यह hacking ka case nahi hai। Yeh governance failure ka case hai—jo legal loopholes aur unverifiable votes ke zariye ghuse aata hai।

Ek Niyamit Mote Ka Anupurva

Ogle ne chain of events ko audit report ki tarah saaf kar diya:

• Risk Labs mein 100M ACX (≈$15M) transfer karne ka proposal—ek company jo Hart Lambur se judee hai।
• Usi Kevin Chan ne maxodds.eth se raaz se vote diya।
• Hart khud dwara fund karee gayi ek aur wallet ne nearly 14% vote diye।
• Reinis FRP ne multiple addresses use karke support badhaya。

Koi public discussion nahi, koi transparency nahi — bas band doore mein coordinated action — paper par full community approval ke sath।

Yeh decentralization nahi hai—yeh centralized control jo DAO mask pehna hua hai।

Yeh Unika Nahi Hai — Yeh Predictable Hai

Mujhe saaf kahna chahata hu: yeh anomaly nahi hai। Hum ise pehle bhi dekh chuke hain:

• Compound DAO ke ‘Golden Boys’
• Jupiter DAO ke self-dealing proposals
• The DAO collapse (2016)

Pattern? Founders token concentration se disproportionate power rakhte hain, phir governance rules ko exploit karte hain jo fairness ke liye banaye gaye the lekin insider abuse ke against checks na banaye gaye the۔

Aur aur zyada daravna? Ogle note karte hain ki kisi bhi aur industry mein, aise actions lawsuits ya board revolts trigger karti thi۔ Lekin crypto mein? Koi boards nahi—fiduciary duties bhi law se enforce nahi hotiyan۔

Ek System Jo Trust Par Bana Hai Lekin Accountability Ke Bina?

mujhe DApp ya governance se anti nahi lagta—I believe in smart contracts and community-driven decisions. Lekin sach bolu toh: aaj ke DAOs mainly decentralized in name only hain۔ Hum physical institutions ko digital ones se badal diye hain jinke identical flaws hain:

• Token whales decisions dominate karte hain;
• Voting data often opaque;
• Funds untraceable wallets mein chali jati hain;
• Aur jab sawal puchha jata hai? Silence ya denial۔ The reality? Inside threats ab external hacks se zyada badhkar nikal rahe hain—and far harder to detect.

To Ab Kya Karein? Design & Rules & Auditability & Accountability & Transparency & Verification & Checks-and-Balances & Guardrails & Privacy-Preserving Mechanisms

Pehla technical: ZK-proofs use karein anonymous lekin verifiable voting ke liye — taki koi apna vote na dekhe lekin sab confirm kar sake ki vo count ho gai tha。 Dusra structural: quadratic voting ya reputation systems implement karein taki whale dominance kam ho aur active contributors passives ko barabar samjhai jaye。 Teesra—or most critical—mandatory third-party audits for all fund transfers, especially those involving core team entities like Risk Labs or foundation-linked wallets.