হংকংয়ের ক্রিপ্টো দমন

#হংকংয়ের_ক্‍‍‍‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‌্‌‍‌্‌⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠

আমি: “এটি ‘হালকা’ভাবেই?”

সিকিউরিটিজ্ &ফিউচারস্ ‌কমিশন (SFC) + Treasury Bureau-এবড!

হঙকঙ-এ,ভারচুয়াল_অসেট_ট্রেডিং/ওয়ালেট_অধীন _সবই _অবশy _LICENSING _দখল!

আউট! - “No transition period”

আপনি ‘দণ്ഡ’-ভঙ្ភ - “জড़াই”

হওয�?

7+বছर! HK\(5M (~\)640K USD)

“ধমক”? No. Policy.

What’s Covered?

Fiat-to-crypto swaps, obscure OTC deals, brokerage services—every one needs SFC license. Even custody/wallets → regulated. Offshore platforms with HKSAR users? Now exposed too. It’s not just big exchanges anymore. The whole crypto liquidity ecosystem in Hong Kong is now under scrutiny.

Why Zero Transition?

The regulators aren’t waiting for compliance—they’re asserting dominance over uncertainty. in blockchain space, ambiguity is currency. But Hong Kong says: “Rules now.” Those built on gray areas have ~2 months to adapt—or vanish.

Cost of Non-Compliance?

The legal cost is only part of it. The strategic loss is greater. The LUNA collapse broke trust—not markets. Now institutional-grade risk control is enforced by law. Policies targeting HKSAR users (DeFi protocols/custodians)? If your system can’t prove SFC compliance by launch date—you’re not just breaking the law; you’re losing credibility across global investor networks.

What Should Traders & Operators Do?

i) Don’t gamble on loopholes. SFC has already flagged several OTC desks as non-compliant under current definitions. i) Start preparing your licensing application NOW: KYC/AML records, audit trails, wallet logs — everything proving operational integrity. iii) Consider if staying open is worth it—or if pivoting to regulated hubs like Singapore/Switzerland makes more sense long-term. every second counts when dealing with crypto regulation—and especially when jail time is part of the risk profile.